Mario Alfonso-Flores v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
485 F. App'x 237
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 201208-73757California306 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mario Alfonso-Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings issued in absentia and to allow him to apply for benefits under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (“NACARA”), §§ 201-203, Pub.L. No. 105-100, 111 . We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 674 (9th Cir.2011). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Alfonso-Flores’ motion to reopen on the ground that he failed to show reasonable cause excusing his failure to attend his hearing. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b) (1989). Alfonso-Flores does not dispute that he received oral notice of his hearing date. See Matter of M-D-, 23 I. & N. Dec. 540, 542 (BIA 2002) (“Prior to 1992, the Act provided only that ‘the alien shall be given notice, reasonable under all the circumstances, of the nature of the charges against him and of the time and place at which the proceedings will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.