Jagdish Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 201210-73191California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 12 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAGDISH SINGH, No. 10-73191

Petitioner, Agency No. A074-384-421

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2012 **

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Jagdish Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen based on

ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). claims of due process violations. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.