Rohr

Rohr v. Salt River Project

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 200906-16527California6,539 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

A. Rohr’s Job at Salt River

From May 1981 to June 14, 2004, Rohr worked as a weld- ing metallurgy specialist in the Plant Technical Support Group at Salt River, which provides utility services to homes in Arizona. [ER 2, 3.] The Plant Technical Support Group was composed of specialists in various fields, including weld- ing metallurgy, turbines, boilers and cathodic protection, as well as the quality assurance staff. [ER 16.] The group’s objective was to address problems that Salt River’s power plants could not solve on their own. [ER 16.] For example, if a power plant requested a new welding procedure, the special- ists in the Plant Technical Support Group would design it. [ER 17.] The Plant Technical Support Group performed audits, reviewed paperwork on the plants to determine whether any applicable code had been violated and responded to third-party inspections. Rohr characterizes the group’s work as mostly “engineering-type support.” [ER 17-18.]

As a metallurgy specialist, Rohr was primarily responsible for overseeing all aspects of Salt River’s welding procedures, maintaining Salt River’s welding manual, training all welding personnel, reviewing and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.