Dukes
Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 200904-16688California169 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;
CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER;
KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE
KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, No. 04-16688 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. v. CV-01-02252-MJJ
WAL-MART, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;
CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER;
KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE No. 04-16720
KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.
CV-01-02252-MJJ
v. ORDER
WAL-MART, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee. Filed February 13, 2009
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
1935 1936 DUKES v. WAL-MART, INC. Judges McKeown, Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.