Sullivan

Sullivan v. Oracle Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 200906-56649California187 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD SULLIVAN; DEANNA EVICH;  No. 06-56649 RICHARD BURKOW, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-05-00392-AHS v. Central District of ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware  California, corporation; ORACLE UNIVERSITY, Santa Ana form unknown, ORDER Defendants-Appellees. WITHDRAWING  OPINION

Filed February 17, 2009

Before: William A. Fletcher and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and Louis H. Pollak,* Senior District Judge.

ORDER

We have today issued an order requesting the California Supreme Court to answer three certified questions of Califor- nia law presented in this case. We hereby withdraw our pub- lished opinion in this case, Sullivan v. Oracle Corp., 547 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 2008), pending a decision by the California Supreme Court on those questions. Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing and Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc are dismissed as moot.

*The Honorable Louis H. Pollak, Senior United States District Judge for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.