Schwarzenegger

Video Software Deal v. Schwarzenegger

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 200907-16620California8,937 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan VIDEO SOFTWARE v. SCHWARZENEGGER 1941, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIDEO SOFTWARE DEALERS 

ASSOCIATION; ENTERTAINMENT

SOFTWARE ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor State of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of No. 07-16620 California, Defendants-Appellants,  D.C. No.

CV-05-04188-RMW

and OPINION GEORGE KENNEDY, in his official capacity as Santa Clara County District Attorney; RICHARD DOYLE, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City of San Jose; ANN MILLER RAVEL, in her official capacity as County Counsel for the County of Santa Clara, Defendants.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 29, 2008—Sacramento, California

Filed February 20, 2009

1937 1938 VIDEO SOFTWARE v. SCHWARZENEGGER Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Sidney R. Thomas and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan VIDEO SOFTWARE v. SCHWARZENEGGER …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.