Waldron-Ramsey
Waldron-Ramsey v. Pacholke
Opinion
Opinion
Gould COUNSEL, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALDO E. WALDRON-RAMSEY, No. 07-35938 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-00131-RHW
DAN PACHOLKE,
OPINION
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Robert H. Whaley, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 10, 2008—Seattle, Washington
Filed February 25, 2009
Before: Robert R. Beezer, Senior Circuit Judge, and Ronald M. Gould and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Gould COUNSEL
David B. Zuckerman, Seattle, Washington, for the petitioner- appellant.
Paul D. Weisser, Office of the Attorney General, Olympia, Washington, for the respondent-appellee.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Waldo Waldron-Ramsey (“Waldron-Ramsey”) appeals the district court’s order denying equitable tolling of the statute of limitations on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition as barred because it was untimely. We affirm the district court’s decision to deny equitable tolling and we affirm the district court’s denial…