Esparaza-Herrera

United States v. Esparaza-Herrera

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 200907-30490California3,316 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 07-30490 v.  D.C. No.

CR-06-00219-BLW

GERARDO ESPARZA-HERRERA, a.k.a. Omar Brabo Beltran, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 11, 2008—Seattle, Washington

Filed February 25, 2009

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge Gould COUNSEL

David E. Hollar, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas Monaghan, Federal Public Defender Services of Idaho, Biose, Idaho, for the defendant-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The United States Government appeals the district court’s ruling that Gerardo Esparza-Herrera’s prior conviction for 2276 UNITED STATES v. ESPARZA-HERRERA aggravated assault under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S”) § 13-1204(A)(11) was not a conviction for a “crime of vio- lence” under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.