Deweaver
Deweaver v. Runnels
Opinion
Opinion
Hug, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EMILE DEWEAVER,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-16865 v. D.C. No.
CV-03-00839-MJJ
DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden, High Desert State Prison, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 21, 2008—San Francisco, California
Filed February 25, 2009
Before: Procter Hug, Jr., John T. Noonan and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Hug
2197 2200 DEWEAVER v. RUNNELS
COUNSEL
Mary E. Pougiales, Novato, California, for the petitioner- appellant.
Juliet B. Haley, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, Cal- ifornia, for the respondent-appellee.
OPINION
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Emile DeWeaver petitions for habeas relief arguing that the California Court of Appeal erroneously concluded that he did not invoke his right to remain silent during interrogation, his confession was voluntary, and the state trial court’s interac- tions with the jury did not coerce a verdict. For DeWeaver to succeed,…