Doe

Doe v. Holy See

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 200906-35563California18,413 words

Opinion

Opinion

Volume 1 of

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN V. DOE,  No. 06-35563 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CV-02-00430-

HOLY SEE, MWM

Defendant-Appellant. 

JOHN V. DOE,  No. 06-35587 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  CV-02-00430-

HOLY SEE, MWM

Defendant-Appellee.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2008—Portland, Oregon

Filed March 3, 2009

Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and Otis D. Wright, II*, District Judge.

*The Honorable Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

2543 2544 DOE v. HOLY SEE Per Curiam Opinion; Dissent by Judge Berzon; Concurrence by Judge Fernandez 2548 DOE v. HOLY SEE

COUNSEL

Jeffrey S. Lena, Law Office…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.