Doe
Doe v. Holy See
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 200906-35563California18,413 words
Opinion
Opinion
Volume 1 of
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN V. DOE, No. 06-35563 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CV-02-00430-
HOLY SEE, MWM
Defendant-Appellant.
JOHN V. DOE, No. 06-35587 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-02-00430-
HOLY SEE, MWM
Defendant-Appellee. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 5, 2008—Portland, Oregon
Filed March 3, 2009
Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and Otis D. Wright, II*, District Judge.
*The Honorable Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
2543 2544 DOE v. HOLY SEE Per Curiam Opinion; Dissent by Judge Berzon; Concurrence by Judge Fernandez 2548 DOE v. HOLY SEE