Lapeter

Canada Life Assurance v. Lapeter

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 200907-35683California5,331 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-35683 v. ALFRED R. LAPETER; SHARON R.  D.C. No.

CV-07-00254-BLW

LAPETER; LAPETER 1985 LIVING

OPINION

TRUST,

Defendants-Appellants.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2008* Seattle, Washington

Filed March 4, 2009

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

2711 2714 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE v. LAPETER

COUNSEL

B. Newal Squyres, Robert A. Faucher, and Kevin C. Braley, Holland & Hart, LLP, on behalf of plaintiff-appellee Canada Life Assurance Co.

Emil R. Berg, Greener Burke Shoemaker P.A., on behalf of defendants-appellants Alfred R. LaPeter and Sharon R. LaPeter as Trustees for the LaPeter 1985 Living Trust.

OPINION

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

Alfred R. LaPeter and Sharon R. LaPeter, as trustees for the LaPeter 1985…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.