Hilgers
United States v. Hilgers
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-30078 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. 6:7-cr-00012-CCL
SCOTT WILLIAM HILGERS,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 8, 2008—Portland, Oregon
Filed March 11, 2009
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Susan P. Graber, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain COUNSEL
Steven C. Haddon, Haddon Law Office, Helena, Montana, argued the cause for the defendant-appellant and submitted a brief.
Carl E. Rostad, Assistant United States Attorney, Great Falls, Montana, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellee and sub- mitted a brief. William M. Mercer, United States Attorney, was on the briefs.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether an above-Guidelines prison sen- tence of a mortgage broker convicted of wire fraud is reason- able.
I
A
Scott Hilgers was a mortgage broker, that is, one who finds homeowner buyers for institutional…