Wheaton

Wheaton v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District

Good Law
559 F.3d 979·2009 A.M.C. 793·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 200907-72141California2,810 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gale Wheaton appeals the denial of his claim for disability benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”). Gale Wheaton was a ferry repairman and mechanic in the Ferry Division of the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District (the “District”). In October 1999, he suffered a back injury while working aboard a vessel on navigable waters of the United States. Wheaton has been paid benefits under California workers’ compensation law. If covered by the LHWCA, he would be entitled to additional disability benefits. The dispute turns on whether the District is a “subdivision” of a state as that term is used in § 3(b) of the LHWCA, 33 U.S.C. § 903 (b), which provides: “No compensation shall be payable in respect of the disability or death of an officer or employee of the United States, or any agency thereof, or of any State or foreign government, or any subdivision thereof.”

An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) found, relying on facts stipulated to by the parties, that the District was a subdivision of the State of California and therefore was excluded from coverage under the LHWCA. Wheaton timely appealed to the LHWCA Benefits Review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.