United States v. Juan Flores

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 200908-30076California1,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Background

Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiracy to pos- sess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, pursuant to a plea agreement in which the Government promised to dismiss two other charges and to recommend a sentencing reduction for Defendant’s accep- tance of responsibility. The agreement also contemplated a “[p]otential [d]eparture” for Defendant’s substantial assis- tance in the form of a motion under either U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, Fed. R. Crim. P. 35, or both. “Substantial assistance” is defined in the agreement as “complete, truthful, forthright, material, important, valuable and meaningful information.” The Government’s obligations are prescribed in the agree- ment as follows: UNITED STATES v. FLORES 3529 The United States will consider and evaluate any written proffer or nature of information and the rec- ommendations of law enforcement. If the prosecu- tion concludes that the assistance provided is substantial, truthful, and complete, as required, a departure motion determined by the government to be appropriate under the circumstances will be made. By this agreement the defendant is not offered or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.