Li

Li v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 200905-70053California9,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw LI v. HOLDER 3653, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XUN LI, 

Petitioner, No. 05-70053 v.  Agency No.

A96-349-858

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. 

XIANGZHE CUI, 

Petitioner, No. 05-72298 v.  Agency No.

A96-349-242

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. 

HE YUN FANG, 

Petitioner, No. 05-76786 v.  Agency No.

A78-312-198

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 6, 2008—Pasadena, California

Filed March 23, 2009

3649 3650 LI v. HOLDER Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wardlaw LI v. HOLDER 3653

COUNSEL

Li v. Holder, No. 05-70053

Joseph S. Porta, Law Offices of Cohen & Kim, Los Angeles, California, for petitioner Xun Li.

Robert C. Balfe, United States Attorney, Western District of Arkansas; Deborah J. Groom, Assistant United States Attor- ney,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.