Estrada
Estrada v. Holder
Opinion
Opinion
Rymer, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ESTUARDO ESTRADA, aka Jose Fermin Estrada, No. 05-75772 Petitioner, v. Agency No.
A070-184-862
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney
OPINION
General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 4, 2009* Pasadena, California
Filed March 26, 2009
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Rymer
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). COUNSEL
Henry A. Posada, Law Offices of Henry A. Posada, Downey, California, for the petitioner.
Daniel E. Goldman, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
OPINION
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
The question before us is whether an alien whose state con- viction for possession of drug paraphernalia was expunged 3650 ESTRADA v. HOLDER under state law, but who violated the terms of his probation before expungement, would have been…