United States v. Patricia Paul

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 200908-30125California7,388 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-30125 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 4:05-cr-00167-SEH

PATRICIA BETTERMAN PAUL,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 5, 2008* Pasadena, California

Filed April 2, 2009

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion; Dissent by Judge Hall

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

3947 3950 UNITED STATES v. PAUL

COUNSEL

Anthony R. Gallagher, Michael Donahoe, Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, Montana, for the defendant-appellant.

William w. Mercer, Carl E. Rostad, United States Attorney’s Office, Great Falls, Montana, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In United States v. Paul, 239 Fed. App’x 353 (9th Cir. 2007) (Paul I), we held that a 16-month sentence imposed on Patricia Betterman Paul for theft from a local government…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.