Northrop Grumman v. Factory Mutual Ins.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 200907-56760California5,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION,  No. 07-56760 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CV-05-08444-DDP

FACTORY MUTUAL INSURANCE ORDER

COMPANY, AMENDING

Defendant-Appellant. OPINION AND  DENYING

PETITION FOR

REHEARING AND

PETITION FOR

REHEARING EN

BANC AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 18, 2008—Pasadena, California

Filed August 14, 2008 Amended April 2, 2009

Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges, and Stephen M. McNamee,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Hall

*The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

3925 3928 NORTHROP GRUMMAN v. FACTORY MUTUAL INS.

COUNSEL

Kirk A. Pasich, Esq., Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Peter Abrahams, Esq., Encino, California, for the defendant-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.