Lapeter

Canada Life Assuranc v. Lapeter

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 200907-35683California5,652 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO.,  No. 07-35683 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CV-07-00254-BLW

ALFRED R. LAPETER; SHARON R. ORDER

LAPETER; LAPETER 1985 LIVING

TRUST,  AMENDING

OPINION AND

Defendants-Appellants. DENYING

PETITION FOR

REHEARING AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2008* Seattle, Washington

Filed March 4, 2009 Amended April 8, 2009

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

4133 4136 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE v. LAPETER

COUNSEL

B. Newal Squyres, Robert A. Faucher, and Kevin C. Braley, Holland & Hart, LLP, on behalf of plaintiff-appellee Canada Life Assurance Co.

Emil R. Berg, Greener Burke Shoemaker P.A., on behalf of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.