In Re Complaint of Misconduct

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 200908-90087California463 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

JUDICIAL COUNCIL

OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL  Nos. 08-90087,

MISCONDUCT 08-90088,

08-90089, 08-90090, 08-90091, 08-90092, 08-90093, 08-90094, 08-90095,  08-90096, 08-90097, 08-90098, 08-90099, 08-90100, 08-90101 and 08-90102

 ORDER

Filed April 15, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

A misconduct complaint has been filed against eleven cir- cuit judges and five district judges.

Complainant, a pro se prisoner, previously filed a miscon- duct complaint alleging that several circuit judges conspired

4345 4346 IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT to cover up a state court judge’s criminal scheme. I dismissed the complaint for lack of evidence that misconduct occurred, and the Judicial Council affirmed the dismissal. See In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, No. 07-89116 (9th Cir. Jud. Council 2008). The current complaint merely repeats the charges raised in the prior complaint and accuses numerous additional judges of involvement in the alleged conspiracy, including all of the judges who participated in the dismissal of complainant’s prior misconduct complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.