Tur

Tur v. Youtube Inc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 200907-56683California1,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT TUR, doing business as  Los Angeles News Service, No. 07-56683 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CV-06-04436-FMC

YOUTUBE, INC., OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Florence-Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2009—Pasadena, California

Filed April 21, 2009

Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion David H. Kramer, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati LLP, Palo Alto, California, argued the cause for the defendant- appellant and filed the briefs. Colleen Bal, Bart E. Volkmer, and Caroline E. Wilson, Palo Alto, California, were on the briefs.

Hal S. Shaftel, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, New York argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellee. Francis Pizzulli, Santa Monica, California, Bert H. Deixler, Proskauer Rose LLP, Los Angeles, California, and David Stickney, Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman LLP, San Diego, California, filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.