Bova

Bova v. City of Medford

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 200908-35091California2,033 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH BOVA; MARLENE SCUDDER, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 08-35091 D.C. No. CITY OF MEDFORD, an incorporated subdivision of the State of  CV-06-01369-PA Oregon; MICHAEL DYAL, City ORDER AND Manager of the City of Medford, OPINION in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Owen M. Panner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 3, 2009—Portland, Oregon

Filed May 4, 2009

Before: Susan P. Graber, Raymond C. Fisher, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Graber COUNSEL

Stephen L. Brischetto, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiffs- appellants.

Robert E. Franz, Jr., Law Office of Robert E. Franz, Jr., Springfield, Oregon, for the defendants-appellees.

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed March 6, 2009, is rede- signated as an authored opinion by Judge Graber with modifi- cations.

With the filing of the attached opinion, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.