BARNES-WALLACE Et v. BOY SCOUTS AM

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 200904-55732California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE; 

MAXWELL BREEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 04-55732 v. D.C. No.

CV-00-01726-

CITY OF SAN DIEGO,

Defendant,  NAJ/AJB Southern District of and California, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-DESERT San Diego

PACIFIC COUNCIL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE; 

MAXWELL BREEN; LORI BARNES-

WALLACE, Guardian Ad Litem; No. 04-56167 LYNN BARNES-WALLACE, Guardian D.C. No. Ad Litem; MICHAEL BREEN, 3:00-CV-01726- Guardian Ad Litem; VALERIE BREEN, Guardian Ad Litem,  J-AJB Southern District of Plaintiffs-Appellants, California, v. San Diego

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; BOY SCOUTS OF ORDER

AMERICA-DESERT PACIFIC COUNCIL,

Defendants-Appellees.  Filed May 15, 2009

Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

5835 5836 BARNES-WALLACE v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

ORDER

On April 1, 2009, the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.