Maness
United States v. Maness
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 200906-30607California1,361 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-30607 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00077-a-
BRET F. MANESS, RRB
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-30035 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00077-a-
BRET F. MANESS, RRB
Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 2, 2009—Seattle, Washington
Filed May 19, 2009
Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Pamela A. Rymer and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion COUNSEL
Bret F. Maness (argued), Atwater, California, pro se defendant-appellant.
Nelson P. Cohen, United States Attorney, Jo Ann Farrington and Thomas C. Bradley (argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Anchorage, Alaska, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Bret F. Maness was convicted of firearm possession fol- lowing a jury trial and,…