Maness

United States v. Maness

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 200906-30607California1,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30607 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-00077-a-

BRET F. MANESS, RRB

Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-30035 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-00077-a-

BRET F. MANESS, RRB

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 2, 2009—Seattle, Washington

Filed May 19, 2009

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Pamela A. Rymer and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion COUNSEL

Bret F. Maness (argued), Atwater, California, pro se defendant-appellant.

Nelson P. Cohen, United States Attorney, Jo Ann Farrington and Thomas C. Bradley (argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Anchorage, Alaska, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Bret F. Maness was convicted of firearm possession fol- lowing a jury trial and,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.