Knappenberger

Knappenberger v. City of Phoenix

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 200907-15774California2,429 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikuta, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE KNAPPENBERGER, an  individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 07-15774 v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a political  D.C. No.

CV-06-02749-JWS

subdivision in the State of

OPINION

Arizona; DOES I-X; CORPORATIONS

A-Z,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2008* San Francisco, California

Filed May 26, 2009

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Andrew J. Kleinfeld and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

6135 6138 KNAPPENBERGER v. CITY OF PHOENIX

COUNSEL

Kathi Man Sandweiss, Kraig J. Marton, Phoenix, Arizona, for the the plaintiff-appellant.

Georgia A. Staton, Gordon Lewis, Eileen Dennis GilBride, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendants-appellees.

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Bruce Knappenberger appeals from the district court’s decision granting the City of Phoenix’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.