Pulido

Pulido v. Lamarque

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 200905-15916California200 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, 

Petitioner-Appellee, No. 05-15916 v.  D.C. No.

CHRIS CHRONES, CV-99-04933-CW

Respondent-Appellant. 

MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO,  No. 05-16308 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-99-04933-CW

CHRIS CHRONES,

ORDER

Respondent-Appellee.  Filed June 9, 2009

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant’s Petition for Reconsideration of Dis- positive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20, 2009 is VACATED.

Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion to file Supplemental Brief Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant’s Supplemental Brief is ordered FILED.

6829 6830 PULIDO v. CHRONES Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief to Petitioner-Appellee’s Supplemental Brief to address the application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.