Marwin Navarro v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marwin Ernesto Navarro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and relief under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Navarro’s experiences, including one beating by national guard soldiers and one detention with no physical harm, do not rise to the level of persecution. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (harassment, threats, and one beating did not compel finding of past persecution). Substantial evidence also supports the conclusion that even if Navarro suffered past persecution, the government rebutted the presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution based on the 1992 peace accords in El Salvador. See…