Marcos Villafuerte Rocha v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
501 F. App'x 676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 201211-72608California249 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Marcos Villafuerte Rocha, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, and review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Aguilar Gonzalez v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d 1204, 1208 (9th Cir.2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Villafuerte Rocha was in-admissable for alien smuggling where the record contains Villafuerte Rocha’s sworn statement admitting that he knew the passengers in his car had no legal documentation to enter the United States, and that he had participated in making arrangements to pick them up in Mexico. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(E)©; Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales, 487 F.3d 742, 748-49 (9th Cir.2007).

We reject Villafuerte Rocha’s due process claim regarding the manner in which the immigration officials obtained his statement. See Cuevas-Ortega v. INS, 588 F.2d 1274, 1278 (9th Cir.1979) (no due process violation because “the bare assertion that a statement is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.