In Re: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 200908-90038California457 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

JUDICIAL COUNCIL

OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL  Nos. 08-90038,

MISCONDUCT 08-90050,

 08-90051, 08-90054 and 08-90135

 ORDER

Filed June 16, 2009

Before: David R. Thompson, Sidney R. Thomas, Susan P. Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, Audrey B. Collins, Irma E. Gonzalez, Robert S. Lasnik, and Robert H. Whaley, Chief District Judges, and Terry J. Hatter, Senior District Judge.

ORDER

On April 1, 2009, the Chief Judge entered an order that required complainant to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his abuse of the misconduct complaint proce- dure. Complainant filed a response that does not respond suf- ficiently to the order to show cause.

We have carefully reviewed the record. Complainant has filed at least ten misconduct complaints over the last five years, all but one of which have been dismissed because com- plainant’s allegations were conclusory and/or related to the merits of the subject judges’ rulings. Pursuant to Rule 10(a) of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Pro- ceedings, we conclude that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.