In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 200908-90172California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

JUDICIAL COUNCIL

OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

  IN RE COMPLAINT No. 08-90172

OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

 ORDER

Filed June 24, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

A misconduct complaint has been filed against a district judge. Complainant, a pro se state prisoner, filed a civil rights action in district court. The matter was assigned to the subject judge.

Complainant alleges that the judge discriminated against him but does not explain how or on what basis. Discrimina- tion is not always improper or unethical; in some circum- stances, it is entirely appropriate. For instance, incarceration of individuals convicted of crimes, like complainant, is a wholly permissible form of discrimination. See McQueary v. Blodgett, 924 F.2d 829, 834-35 (9th Cir. 1991). Only unlaw- ful or invidious discrimination might amount to judicial mis- conduct, and complainant has not alleged discrimination of that kind. This charge must therefore be dismissed for failure to allege conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts. See Judicial- Conduct Rule 11(c)(1)(A).

To the extent complainant may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.