Ganezer

Ganezer v. Directby

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 200909-55818California174 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHIL GANEZER and LYNETTE SOHL,  No. 09-55818 on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; et D.C. No. al., 2:08-cv-08666- Plaintiffs-Appellees,  GAF-RC Central District of v. California, DIRECTBUY, INC., an Indiana Los Angeles Corporation,

ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.  Filed June 25, 2009

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is vacated. This matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to stay pro- ceedings pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in Hertz Corp. v. Friend, No. 08-16963, 2008 WL 4750198 (9th Cir. Oct. 30, 2008), cert. granted, 2009 WL 559348 (U.S. June 8, 2009) (No. 08-1107). The appeal is removed from the July 10, 2009, Pasadena calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8191

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.