Soriano

Soriano v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 200905-72116California1,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

To be eligible for asylum, an alien must show that he is unwilling or unable to return to his country of origin “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a partic- ular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A). Petitioner argues that he fears future perse- cution on account of his “political opinion” and membership in a “particular social group.” He argues that his opposition 8016 SORIANO v. HOLDER to organized crime constitutes a political opinion and that, as someone who gave information to the police, “he is forever- more a member of a social group of ‘government infor- mants.’ ” We will consider each theory in turn.

A. Political Opinion

[1] To show that he was persecuted on account of a politi- cal opinion, Petitioner must satisfy two requirements. First, he must show that he held (or his persecutors believed that he held) a political opinion. Ernesto Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646, 656 (9th Cir. 2000). Second, he must show that his persecu- tors persecuted him (or that he faces the prospect of such per- secution) because of his political…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.