United States v. Ronnie Owen

Good Law
507 F. App'x 648
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 201312-30023California322 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-30023

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00098-FVS

v.

MEMORANDUM *

RONNIE OWEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Ronnie Owen appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

guilty-plea conviction and 36-month sentence for identity theft, in violation of

U.S.C. § 1028(a)(3). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Owen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

with a motion to withdraw as counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.