United States v. Ronnie Owen
507 F. App'x 648
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 201312-30023California322 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 02 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-30023
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00098-FVS
v.
MEMORANDUM *
RONNIE OWEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2012 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Ronnie Owen appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea conviction and 36-month sentence for identity theft, in violation of
U.S.C. § 1028(a)(3). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Owen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along
with a motion to withdraw as counsel…