United States v. Ricardo Santacruz-Becerill

Good Law
507 F. App'x 662
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 201311-10522California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10522

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00466-PMP

v.

MEMORANDUM *

RICARDO SANTACRUZ-BECERILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Ricardo Santacruz-Becerill appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 151-month sentence for conspiracy to

distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Santacruz-Becerill’s counsel has filed a brief stating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.