Popa

Popa v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 6, 200905-76507California3,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On July 29, 2002, Popa was lawfully admitted to the United States as an exchange visitor1 authorized to remain in the U.S. 1 Popa entered the U.S. on a J-1 Exchange Visitor Visa. A J-1 Visa is provided to individuals “for educational and cultural exchange programs POPA v. HOLDER 8231 until October 19, 2002. After entering the United States, Popa married Jason A. San Souci, a U.S. citizen.2 On April 1, 2003, San Souci filed a Form I-130—a “Petition for Alien Relative” —with the Bureau of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Ser- vices (“USCIS”) on behalf of Popa; that same day, Popa applied to USCIS to become a permanent resident based on the Form I-130. Popa and San Souci lived in Nevada and used a mail address: P.O. Box 971, Crystal Bay, Nevada.

In January 2004, San Souci informed Popa he had to travel to New Jersey to attend a child custody hearing regarding his son from a previous marriage. On January 26, 2004, without informing Popa, San Souci withdrew the Form I-130 petition; accordingly, on February 5, 2004, USCIS denied Popa’s application for status as a permanent resident and sent notice of the denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.