Ringold
United States v. Ringold
Opinion
Opinion
Thomas COUNSEL, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-10492 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-05- 00805-MJJ
ARNOLD RINGGOLD,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 15, 2008—Pasadena, California
Filed July 7, 2009
Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Edward Leavy and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Thomas COUNSEL
Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, and Jerome E. Matthews (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Oak- land, California, for the defendant-appellant.
Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, Barbara J. Val- liere, Assistant United States Attorney, and W.S. Wilson Leung (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, San Fran- cisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns the question whether, after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a district court abuses its discretion by declining to consider the…