Jane Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 200908-55706California3,437 words

Opinion

Opinion

GOULD, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANE DOE I; JANE DOE II; JOHN 

DOE I; JOHN DOE II individually and on behalf of Wal-Mart workers in Shenzhen China; JANE DOE III; JANE DOE IV, individually and on behalf of Wal-Mart workers in Dhaka, Bangladesh;

JANE DOE V; JANE DOE VI; JOHN

DOE III, individually and on behalf of Wal-Mart workers in Bogor, Indonesia; JANE DOE VII; JANE DOE VIII individually and on behalf of Wal-Mart workers in No. 08-55706 Mastaphia Swaziland; JANE DOE

IX; JANE DOE X; JANE DOE XI;

JOHN DOE IV, individually and on  D.C. No. 2:05-cv-07307-AG behalf of Wal-Mart workers in OPINION Managua and Sebaco, Nicaragua;

KRISTINE DALL; BRUCE REEVES;

CHRISTINE KAPOSY; SHARLOTTE

VILLACORTA, individually and on behalf of similarly situated California workers, c/o 8530 Stanton Avenue, Buena Park, CA 90622, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. 

8611 8612 DOE v. WAL-MART Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 8, 2009—Pasadena,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.