Uhm

Uhm v. Humana Inc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 200906-35672California188 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DO SUNG UHM; EUN SOOK UHM, a  married couple, individually and No. 06-35672 for all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.

CV-06-00185-RSM

v.  Western District of HUMANA INC., a Delaware Washington, corporation; HUMANA HEALTH PLAN Seattle INC., a Kentucky corporation doing

ORDER

business as Humana, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed July 22, 2009

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Richard A. Paez and Marsha S. Berzon,* Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellees’ request for reconsideration shall be treated as a petition for panel rehearing and is GRANTED. The opinion filed on August 25, 2008 and reported at 540 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2008) is WITHDRAWN and shall not be cited as prece- dent. The petition for rehearing en banc is moot. The panel will file a new disposition in due course.

*Due to the unavailability of Senior District Judge William Schwarzer, Judge Berzon has been randomly drawn as a replacement judge.

9381

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.