United States v. David Harris

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 200908-10370California408 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-10370 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  2:07-cr-00295-KJD-

DAVID L. HARRIS, GWF

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 13, 2009* San Francisco, California

Filed July 24, 2009

Before: Barry G. Silverman, Richard R. Clifton, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

9645 9646 UNITED STATES v. HARRIS

COUNSEL

Jason F. Carr, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the defendant-appellant.

Peter S. Levitt, United States Attorney’s Office, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the plaintiffs-appellees. UNITED STATES v. HARRIS 9647

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

David L. Harris appeals his sentence following his convic- tion for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We review de novo the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.