United States v. Kenneth Paulk
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50229 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:92-cr-00738-TJH
KENNETH LAMONT PAULK, ORDER AND
Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 2, 2009* Pasadena, California
Filed June 24, 2009 Amended August 6, 2009
Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
10447 UNITED STATES v. PAULK 10449
COUNSEL
Carlton F. Gunn, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Ange- les, California, for defendant-appellant Kenneth Paulk.
Daniel B. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Ange- les, California, for plaintiff-appellee United States of Amer- ica.
ORDER
The mandate is recalled. The opinion published on June 24, 2009, and appearing at 569 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2009), is…