Flores

Flores v. Horne

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 200907-15603California297 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIRIAM FLORES, individually and  as a parent of Miriam Flores, minor child; ROSA RZESLAWSKI, individually and as a parent of Mario Rzeslawski, minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

SPEAKER OF THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES AND PRESIDENT OF

THE ARIZONA SENATE,

Intervenor, No. 07-15603 v. D.C. No.

STATE OF ARIZONA,

Defendant-Appellee,  CV-92-00596-RCC District of Arizona, THOMAS C. HORNE, Superintendent Tucson of Public Instruction, Defendant-Appellant, and

C. DIANE BISHOP, Superintendent

of Public Instruction; EUGENE

HUGHES; DAVID SILVA; CLAUDINE

BATES ARTHUR; JOHN HOSNER; KEN

BENNETT; RAY KELLIS; JIM ALLMAN;

MORRISON WARREN, members of the State Board of Education, Defendants. 

10919 10920 FLORES v. HORNE

MIRIAM FLORES, individually and  as a parent of Miriam Flores, minor child; ROSA RZESLAWSKI, individually and as a parent of Mario Rzeslawski, minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SPEAKER OF THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES AND PRESIDENT OF

THE ARIZONA SENATE, No. 07-15605 Intervenor-Appellant, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.