United States v. Efrain Rivera-Ramos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 200908-10174California2,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-10174 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  4:07-cr-00307-RCC-

EFRAIN RIVERA-RAMOS, HCE-

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2009—San Francisco, California

Filed August 21, 2009

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Eugene E. Siler, Jr.,* and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Reinhardt

*The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

11531 UNITED STATES v. RIVERA-RAMOS 11533

COUNSEL

Roger H. Sigal, Tucson, Arizona, for the defendant-appellant.

Diane J. Humetewa, United States Attorney, and Angela W. Woodridge, Assistant United States Attorney, Tucson, Ari- zona, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether New York’s definition of “at- tempt” is categorically broader than the common…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.