Rutti
Rutti v. Lojack Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 200907-56599California10,607 words
Opinion
Opinion
CALLAHAN, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIKE RUTTI,
Plaintiff-Appellant, and
KEVIN VERMILLION; ISAAC
CHARLESWORTH; MURRAY M.
MYERS; DAN JOHNSTON; ORLANDO No. 07-56599
JASON WHITE; GICARDO LEAL;
PHILIP REDFIELD; JEROME CHARLES D.C. No.
CV-06-00350-DOC
WEISS; NICK KAMINSKY; MARCUS E.
MCKAY; RICHARD DEMELO; CHRIS OPINION
MEACHAM; ESHON D. MITCHELL,
Plaintiffs, v.
LOJACK CORPORATION, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 4, 2009—Pasadena, California
Filed August 21, 2009
Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Barry G. Silverman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Callahan; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Hall; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Silverman
11449 RUTTI v. LOJACK CORP. 11453
COUNSEL
Matthew Righetti and John Glugoski (argued) of the Righetti Law Firm of San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs- appellants.