Landin-Molina

Landin-Molina v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 200905-73677California4,700 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKeown, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR LANDIN-MOLINA, 

Petitioner, No. 05-73677 v.  Agency No. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney A079-652-076 General, Respondent. 

PETRA ESTRADA-MENDOZA, 

Petitioner, No. 05-75825 v.  Agency No.

A076-346-685

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2009* San Francisco, California

Filed September 1, 2009

Before: Stephen S. Trott, M. Margaret McKeown and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge McKeown

*The panel unanimously finds these cases suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

12179 LANDIN-MOLINA v. HOLDER 12181

COUNSEL

Nicomedes E. Suriel, Phoenix, Arizona, for petitioner Landin- Molina. 12182 LANDIN-MOLINA v. HOLDER Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Mark C. Wal- ters, Assistant Director, Joanne E. Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.