Maxim Lam v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 200908-35221California3,060 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Background

The federal government contends that Lam participated in a scheme, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), that helped ille- gal aliens procure Oregon driver’s licenses. Section 1324(a) criminalizes harboring or bringing illegal aliens into the United States. On February 20, 2004, the government filed a civil forfeiture complaint in federal district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1355 against assets allegedly traceable to Lam’s scheme. The district court issued a warrant for arrest in rem and seizure.

A month later, the federal government obtained an indict- ment against Lam. It charged him with ten counts of encour- aging aliens to reside in the United States unlawfully, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), by facilitating their unlawful acquisition of Oregon driver’s licenses. The govern- ment then filed an amended civil forfeiture complaint specify- ing additional assets seized from Lam’s home and his safe deposit box. The amended complaint was supported by an affidavit from Glenn Watson, a Special Agent with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Service, who investigated the driver’s license scheme. The court issued an amended warrant for arrest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.