Marin General Hosp v. Modesto & Empire

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 200907-16518California4,644 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Background

According to its complaint, Marin General Hospital (“the Hospital”) telephoned the Medical Benefits Administrators of 13174 MARIN GENERAL v. MODESTO & EMPIRE TRACTION M.D., Inc., (“MBAMD”) on April 8, 2004, to confirm that a prospective patient had health insurance through an ERISA plan provided by his employer, Modesto & Empire Traction Co. (“Modesto”). MBAMD was the administrator of Modes- to’s plan. According to the complaint, MBAMD orally veri- fied the patient’s coverage, authorized treatment, and agreed to cover 90% of the patient’s medical expenses at the Hospi- tal.

Between April 19 and April 24, 2004, the Hospital per- formed a lumbar fusion procedure on the patient. The Hospi- tal then submitted a bill to MBAMD for $178,926.54. MBAMD paid the Hospital $46,655.54 and stated in a letter that the Hospital was not entitled to further payment. The Hospital sent MBAMD a letter stating that “[p]er your con- tract this claim should be paid at 90% of total charges.” MBAMD denied that it had such a contract with the Hospital and refused to make additional payment.

On December 8, 2006, the Hospital filed suit in California state court against Modesto, MBAMD,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.