Hamilton

Hamilton v. Ayers

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 200906-99008California19,735 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

We recite verbatim the district court’s statement of facts, which closely tracks the California Supreme Court’s opinion, see People v. Hamilton, 774 P.2d 730, 733-35 (Cal. 1989), and which neither party disputes.

In 1981, Hamilton, his wife Gwendolyn (Gwen) who was pregnant, and their four children, ages six, four, three and one, lived in Bakersfield. In March of that year, the Hamiltons purchased life insurance poli- cies, $175,000 on Hamilton and $100,000 on Gwen, paying the initial premium for coverage until June. When they did not pay the second quarterly payment on time, the agent personally collected the payment from Hamilton, extending the policy into September. When the third premium was not received, the agent again visited the Hamiltons on October 17, collect- ing payment for two months from Gwen, extending the policies into November.

In September, Hamilton began an extramarital relationship with Brenda Burns. In October, he cal- led his sister Carolyn Hamilton to ask if she knew anyone who would do something illegal for money. Later he told Carolyn he wanted someone to kill Gwen and offered her $20,000 from the insurance on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.