United States v. Juan Lemus

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 200908-50403California3,465 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bybee, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  No. 08-50403 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  3:07-cr-03238-

JUAN HERNAN LEMUS, VQH-

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 1, 2009* Las Vegas, Nevada

Filed September 22, 2009

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bybee

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

13719 13722 UNITED STATES v. LEMUS

COUNSEL

Kyle W. Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney; Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney; and Bruce R. Castetter, Assis- tant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Jeremy D. Warren, San Diego, California, for the defendant- appellant.

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

Juan Hernan Lemus appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.