Guggenheim

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 200906-56306California24,737 words

Opinion

Opinion

BYBEE, J.

Volume 1 of

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL GUGGENHEIM; SUSAN 

GUGGENHEIM; MAUREEN H. PIERCE,

No. 06-56306 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.  D.C. No.

CV-02-02478-FMC

CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal

OPINION

corporation, Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Florence Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 7, 2008—Pasadena, California

Filed September 28, 2009

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bybee; Dissent by Judge Kleinfeld

13803 13808 GUGGENHEIM v. CITY OF GOLETA

COUNSEL

Mark D. Alpert, Robert S. Coldren (argued), and C. William Dahlin, Santa Ana, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Julie Hayward Biggs and Amy E. Morgan (argued), Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

Daniel Guggenheim and others bring a facial challenge to the City of Goleta’s mobile home rent control ordinance. GUGGENHEIM v. CITY OF GOLETA 13809 Guggenheim argues that the ordinance, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.