United States v. William Ruehle
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 200909-50161California7,242 words
Opinion
Opinion
TALLMAN, J.
FILED
FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50161
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:08-CR-00139-cjc-
v.
OPINION
WILLIAM J. RUEHLE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 1, 2009 Pasadena, California
Filed
Before: FISHER, GOULD, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Circuit Judge Richard C. Tallman
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
We here explore the treacherous path which corporate counsel must tread
under the attorney-client privilege when conducting an internal investigation to
advise a publicly traded company on its financial disclosure obligations. Defendant-Appellee William J. Ruehle is the former Chief Financial Officer
(“CFO”) of Broadcom Corporation, a California-based, publicly traded
semiconductor supplier that came under intense scrutiny for its suspected
backdating of company stock options. Following a…